Federal Magistrate Judges around the country are pleased and proud to participate in public outreach and education to their local communities through the year including Naturalization Ceremonies, Robes in Schools and other presentations each year. FMJA members provide resources to the community, including schools on the U.S. Judicial System in conjunction with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and FMJA. These photos represent just a few of the activities Federal Magistrate Judges have participated in this year.
Saint-Marc’s formal swearing in as a magistrate judge marked a watershed moment in New Hampshire, as she became the first Black person to serve on the federal bench in the state. Click here to read more about Judge Saint-Marc and her journey to the bench.
This video, produced by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, judges and public defenders make the case for why everyone has a stake in the right to counsel.
“It’s protecting every one of us from government overreach,” said Akin Adepoju, Branch Chief, Federal Defender Services, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. “It’s a way we keep the government in check. The Founders of this country recognized the importance of that, and that’s why it’s in the Constitution.”
Judges and attorneys in the video tell the story of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, which is 60 years old this year. The video is the latest installment in the Court Shorts series of brief videos on pillars of court literacy: rule of law, separation of powers, and judicial impartiality. The series is in the lineup of educational videos on the federal judiciary’s YouTube channel.
Featured in the video are U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Feldman, of the Western District of New York; U.S. District Judge Catherine C. Blake, District of Maryland; U.S. District Judge Raner C. Collins, District of Arizona; Federal Public Defender Kyana K. Givens, Massachusetts; Federal Public Defender Eric A. Vos, Puerto Rico; and Akin Adepoju, of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts’ Defender Services Office.
Judge Song Quiroga presided over a Naturalization ceremony for almost 200 people in July 2023. Click here to view the news clip of this wonderful event-just another example of FMJA members involved in and for their local communities.
Author: Karen Wells Roby
A federal judge rules on a case, and a member of the public disagrees and posts on an online site rating judges, “We should gather a petition to recall the judge!” Another judge encounters a member of the public, who asks, “You’re a federal judge. What do you think of your boss, the attorney general?” A student asks a federal judge who came to speak to the class, “When do you run for re-election?”
This kind of confusion about what federal judges do and how they are chosen are just a few examples of the public’s understanding of our court system and its function. We have all seen the confusion among students, neighbors, and even elected officials. Does the public really have an understanding of the importance of a fair and impartial court system in the protection of their rights and liberties?
Over the last 10 years, attention has been given to math, science, and reading—largely due to the No Child Left Behind Act, which gives priority to federal funding for efforts that improve students’ performance in these content areas. With all the attention placed on these core subjects, the study of government, civics, social studies, and history has continued to decline in our schools. The National Center for Learning and Citizenship maintains a database on citizenship education, which shows that, even though 49 states have standards addressing citizenship education, fewer than half have any testing or assessment of this content area. In fact, the National Center for Education Statistics in Washington, D.C., found that only 27 percent of 12th graders in 2006 were proficient in civics and government. (The center reassessed this content area in 2010 and the results of its findings are due out later this year.)
Judges have long been concerned about the pub- lic’s knowledge of citizenship, government, and civ- ics and the differences in the functions and structure of our government. As such, individual courts and judges—and even the Administrative Office of the Federal Courts—have developed programs to educate the public in the area of civics literacy and its impact on public understanding of and the appreciation for the courts and their role in our system.
Creation of the Task Force on Civics Education
Recognizing that many individual federal judges, federal courts, civic groups, and the Administrative Office of the Federal Courts have prepared and gathered materials that could help make judges’ efforts easier and more effective, the board of directors of the Federal Judges Association (FJA) endorsed the exploration of the role of its organization in the area of civics education. Under the leadership of its president, Royal Furgeson, the FJA created the Task Force on Civics Education and reached out to the Federal Magistrate Judges Association (FMJA) and the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges Association (NCBJ).
The task force is chaired by Laura Swain, U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York, and is co- vice-chaired by Karen Wells Roby, U.S. magistrate judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana and president-elect of the FMJA, and Laurel M. Isicoff, U.S. bankruptcy judge for the Southern District of Florida. Other members of the task force are members of the FJA’s Judicial Independence Committee, including Joy Conti, U.S. district judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Philip Martinez, U.S. district judge for the Western District of Texas; Norman Mordue, U.S. district judge for the North District of New York; Edward Prado, circuit judge for the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; and James Donohue, U.S. magistrate judge for the Western District of Washington, who is also a member of the FMJA.
A Foundation Grant and a Toolkit Under Construction
Since its creation in April, the Task Force on Civics Education has been at work and has secured a generous grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation to fund the development of our first project: a Civics Education Toolkit (CET) of presentation materials that can be used by federal judges. The grant was also used to develop content and best practices recommendations for stand-alone civics education materials for distribution to the public through local court websites. Working with the task force, Professor Susan Moeller, the director of the University of Maryland’s International Center for Media and the Public Agenda, will lead a small staff of researchers over the next several months on the following projects:
- Developing the CET—a Web-based library of some of the best available nonpartisan royalty-free presentation materials that are suitable for use by federal judges with student and adult audiences in diverse areas of the country. The library will include videos, interactive games, tools, digital slide shows, and handouts. Topics will cover the nature and structure of the courts, the rule of law, the Constitution, and the importance of fair and impartial courts to the protection of rights, including free speech. The CET will be made available on the public side of the FJA’s website, and the task force will explore the possibility of making the CET available on the FMJA and NCBJ websites.
- Reviewing the websites of circuit, district, and bankruptcy courts to assess current offerings of civics education materials and the preparation of a White Paper that will include best practices recommendations for specific materials and means of providing access to them.
- Developing a design for a small-scale “alpha” or pilot launch of the toolkit for evaluation and testing by judges and courts. Planning will also begin for further expansion and broader scale deployment of the CET.
More Partnerships and a Developing Agenda
The Task Force on Civics Education, through the good graces of Judge Krieger of the U.S. District Court of Colorado, is forging connections with a national effort to foster the establishment of robust court-based federal and state civics education initiatives and other successful programs throughout the country. This effort is being coordinated by Justice at Stake, a nonpartisan group whose mission is to keep courts fair and impartial. Several months ago, Justice at Stake began the development of best practice guidelines for the development of such programs and will be working to spur the creation of new programs in several states over the next few years. We hope that the Federal Judges Association’s task force can play a role in making connections between state and federal judges who can work together in their home states and also benefit from the collaboration in other ways.
The Task Force on Civics Education continues to make connections and will explore other ways in which the FJA, FMJA, and NCBJ can support and enhance our members’ efforts in the area of civics literacy. Increasing the public’s knowledge about the way courts work, our role in government, and the importance of fair and impartial courts in the resolution of important issues affecting daily life can only improve respect for the integrity of the courts’ decisions and the public’s willingness to support the functional independence of the third branch of government, including fair compensation.
Published on February 19, 2013 by USCourts.gov
Assistant Federal Public Defenders Dani Jahn and Jonathan Jeffress discuss the importance of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. Wainwright with a group of school teachers.
Fifty years after Gideon v. Wainwright redefined and reaffirmed a criminal defendant’s right to counsel, the U.S. Courts have unveiled a series of courtroom-ready and classroom-ready activities to provide a teen-age perspective on the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, which was decided on March 18, 1963.
The activities were launched in a January program, at the Washington, D.C., district court. Teachers from across the nation re-enacted the case, and then discussed a wide range of questions with assistant federal public defenders. View the audio slideshow and listen to assistant federal public defenders discuss the importance of the right to counsel.
Interactive resources for high school teachers and their students include:
- A brief podcast and case summary give an overview of the case.
- A readers theater script allows students to re-enact the story of Clarence Gideon, starting when he was in eighth grade.
- A realistic scenario, in which law-abiding teens could find themselves, is a platform for students to apply Gideon and build a case as public defenders. A teachers’ guide is included.
For further information, contact the National Outreach Manager(link sends e-mail) for the Federal Courts.
Published on March 18, 2013 by USCourts.gov
To mark the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright, the landmark Supreme Court decision that redefined the right to counsel, Federal Public Defenders for the District of Columbia and high school students from across the nation are bringing the case to federal court.
The program, developed by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts for courts across the country, includes student re-enactments of Gideon v. Wainwright and In re Gault, the case that established the right to counsel for juveniles. Students also have an opportunity for a no-holds-barred conversation with the defenders about issues of importance to teens.
D.C. Federal Public Defenders are conducting three courtroom events with students from almost every state who are visiting Washington, D.C., under the auspices of the Close Up Foundation, on April 3, May 1, and May 29.
The materials and how-to information for use in courtrooms and classrooms are available in the Educational Resources section on uscourts.gov. To find a nearby, participating federal courthouse, contact the National Outreach Manager at AOgrp_Outreach@ao.uscourts.gov(link sends e-mail).
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright on March 18, 1963. Clarence Gideon, who was convicted of breaking and entering, successfully appealed his case while in a Florida prison, arguing that he had a right to state-appointed counsel under the Constitution.